A Lebanese-Canadian university professor has been convicted in absentia for the 1980 Paris synagogue bombing that killed four people.
Hassan Diab, 69, was sentenced to life imprisonment in his absence and an arrest warrant was issued against him.
Prosecutors had said in their closing arguments that there was “no possible doubt” that Diab, the only suspect, was behind the attack.
Speaking to reporters in Ottawa, Diab called the verdict “Kafkaesque” and “not fair.”
“We’d hoped reason would prevail,” he said, adding that he expects Canada not to send him back to France to serve the sentence.
Diab’s lawyer, Donald Bayne, said the conviction a miscarriage of justice.
“The evidence shows he’s innocent and yet they’ve convicted him,” he said.
“It’s a political result. It’s a wrongful conviction.”
Diab remains in Canada and did not attend the Paris trial.
Reacting to the verdict, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did not say what the country would do in response.
“We will look carefully at next steps, at what the French government chooses to do, at what French tribunals choose to do,” he told a news conference.
“But we will always be there to stand up for Canadians and their rights.”
What happened in 1980?
In the early evening of October 3, 1980, explosives placed on a motorcycle detonated close to a synagogue on the Rue Copernic in Paris’s chic 16th district, killing a student passing by on a motorbike, a driver, an Israeli journalist and a caretaker.
Forty-six others were injured in the blast.
The bombing was the first deadly attack against a Jewish target on French soil since World War II.
No organisation claimed responsibility, but police suspected a splinter group of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
Why was Diab accused?
French intelligence agents in 1999 accused Diab of having made the 10kg bomb.
They pointed to Diab’s likeness with police sketches drawn at the time and handwriting analysis that they said confirmed him as the person who bought the motorbike used in the attack.
They also produced a key item of evidence against him – a passport in his name, seized in Rome in 1981, with entry and exit stamps from Spain, where the attack plan was believed to have originated.
In 2014, Canada extradited Diab at the request of the French authorities. However, investigating judges could not prove his guilt during the investigation, and Diab was released, leaving France for Canada as a free man in 2018.
Three years later, a French court overturned this earlier decision and ordered Diab to stand trial on charges of murder, attempted murder and destruction of property in connection with a terrorist enterprise.
Denials
Most of the evidence presented against Diab was based on intelligence sources, and his lawyers had again argued the case should be thrown out.
“I’m in front of you to avoid a miscarriage of justice,” celebrity defence lawyer William Bourdon told the court, saying an acquittal was “the only judicial decision possible”.
Diab has claimed he was sitting exams in Lebanon at the time of the attack, backed up by statements from his ex-partner and former students.
His conviction means he will again become the subject of an arrest warrant, which risks stoking diplomatic tensions between France and Canada after his first extradition took six years.
David Pere, a lawyer for some of the people in the synagogue at the time of the bombing, said his clients were “not motivated by vengeance nor looking for a guilty person’s head to stick on a pike… they want justice to be done”.
Diab has won some backing from Non-Government Organisation (NGOs), including Amnesty International, who said his assertion that he was in Lebanon at the time of the attack was credible.
